Revenge Porn

CASE LAW UPDATE:  Whether the revenge porn statute is not unconstitutionally vague?    

Defendant was convicted of nonconsensual dissemination of private sexual images, Minn. Stat. §617.261, colloquially known as revenge porn.  He appealed.  Defendant argued that the statute was unconstitutionally vague.  The Minnesota Court of Appeals concluded that the defendant failed to meet the very heavy burden of establishing that Minn. Stat. §617.261 was unconstitutionally vague.  Affirmed.

State v. Casillas, A19-0576, Dakota County.

Minnesota Criminal Defense Lawyer Lynne Torgerson was not attorney of record in this case.

By |2021-07-06T02:12:19+00:00July 6th, 2021|Victories/Case Law Updates|0 Comments

About the Author:

Leave A Comment