Revenge porn statute

CASE LAW UPDATE:  Whether the revenge porn statute is constitutional?    

Defendant was convicted of violating the revenge porn statute, non-consensual dissemination of private sexual images under Minnesota Statute §617.261.  The constitutionality of same was challenged all the way to the Minnesota Supreme Court, on the grounds that it was unconstitutionally vague on its face.  On remand to the Minnesota Court of Appeals, that court held that the revenge porn statute is not unconstitutionally vague.  Conviction affirmed.

State v. Saari, A19-1102, St. Louis County.

Minnesota Criminal Defense Lawyer Lynne Torgerson was not attorney of record in this case.

By |2021-07-17T01:33:55+00:00July 17th, 2021|Victories/Case Law Updates|0 Comments

About the Author:

Leave A Comment