CASE LAW UPDATE: Whether the trial court improperly revoked defendant’s probation?
Defendant’s probation was revoked. He appealed. On appeal, defendant contended that the trial court failed to make adequate findings supporting revocation. The Minnesota Court of Appeals upheld the revocation of defendant’s probation on the grounds that he had an extensive history of second chances of which he failed to avail himself.
State v. Holm, A20-1605, Faribault County.
Minneapolis Criminal Defense Lawyer Lynne Torgerson was not attorney of record in this case.