CASE LAW UPDATE: Whether the trial court properly revoked defendant’s probation?
Defendant appealed from the trial court’s revocation of his probation. He argued that the trial court failed to make the required findings before revoking his probation, and, that the record did not support revocation of his probation. Noting the trial court’s findings regarding defendant’s failure to notify his probation officer of his whereabouts, or to provide his address, and its observations that he was not willing to submit to supervision, the Minnesota Court of Appeals concluded that the trial court adequ8ately considered defendant’s need for confinement. Affirmed.
State v. Craven, A21-1120, Douglas County.
Minnesota Criminal Defense Lawyer Lynne Torgerson was not attorney of record in this case.