Minnesota Criminal Defense Lawyer

CASE LAW UPDATE:  Whether the automobile exception is applicable?    

Where defendant challenged a warrantless search of his vehicle, the police had probable cause to believe that the vehicle contained drugs and they knew the vehicle was mobile, so the automobile exception applied and no further exigency was required.  Affirmed.

United States v. Barron, 20-3440, per curiam.  Appealed from United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas.

Minnesota Criminal Defense Lawyer Lynne Torgerson was not attorney of record in this case.

By |2022-04-14T04:02:37+00:00April 14th, 2022|Victories/Case Law Updates|0 Comments

About the Author:

Leave A Comment