CASE LAW UPDATE: Whether there was sufficient evidence to prove possession with intent to distribute?
Defendant was convicted of conspiracy to distribute drugs and possession with intent to distribute. Defendant appealed. The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld defendant’s convictions on the grounds that there was sufficient evidence because the testimony was consistent with intent to distribute, he was not sharing drugs for personal use, and it was not a mere buyer-seller case. Affirmed.
United States v. Little, 19-2729, per curiam. Appealed from the United States District Court, District of South Dakota.
Minnesota Criminal Defense Lawyer Lynne Torgerson was not attorney of record in this case.