Criminal Sexual Conduct Charges

CASE LAW UPDATE:  Whether admission of the Spreigl evidence was not error?    

Defendant was convicted of 1st degree criminal sexual conduct.  Defendant appealed.  Defendant argued that the trial court erred in admitting evidence of a prior sexual assault, Spreigl evidence.  The Minnesota Court of Appeals held that the trial court did not err in admitting Spreigl evidence.

State v. Lea, A20-0042, Hennepin County.

Minneapolis Criminal Defense Lawyer Lynne Torgerson was not attorney of record in this case.

By |2021-05-13T22:19:42+00:00May 13th, 2021|Victories/Case Law Updates|0 Comments

About the Author:

Leave A Comment