Child Pornography Lawyer

CASE LAW UPDATE:  Whether there was no error in the District Court’s sentence in this child pornography case?    

Where a defendant challenged his sentence in a child pornography case, the District Court did not err by considering Dropbox files when it calculated his offense level, and enhancements for distribution in exchange for valuable consideration, for sadistic images of a toddler, and for possession of more than 600 images were properly imposed.  Affirmed.

United States v. Hennings, 20-3483, per curiam.  Appealed from the United States District Court, Southern District of Iowa.

Minneapolis Criminal Defense Lawyer Lynne Torgerson was not attorney of record in this case.

By |2022-02-07T04:32:58+00:00February 7th, 2022|Victories/Case Law Updates|0 Comments

About the Author:

Leave A Comment