Child pornography sentence
Defendant was convicted of child pornography. The trial court imposed three (3) separate sentences for his child pornography convictions. Defendant argued that the trial court erred in imposing three (3) separate sentences because the State failed to demonstrate that the offenses were committed as separate behavioral incidents or that they involved three (3) different victims. The Minnesota Court of Appeals reversed and held that the trial court erred by concluding that the crimes involved separate behavioral incidents or that the crimes involved three (3) different victims. Reversed and remanded.
State v. Kohlwey, A18-1253, Dakota County.
Minnesota Criminal Defense Lawyer Lynne Torgerson was not attorney of record in this case.