1st degree controlled substance crime

CASE LAW UPDATE:  Whether it was not error to deny a mistrial after a police officer testified that he knew defendant from a different investigation?    

Defendant was convicted of 1st degree controlled substance crime, unlawful possession of a firearm, and threats of violence.  He appealed.  On appeal, defendant argued that the trial court committed reversible error by denying his motion for a mistrial after a police officer impermissibly testified that he knew defendant from another investigation.  Noting that (1) the challenged testimony was isolated and brief; (2) the evidence against defendant was strong; and (3) the trial court provided a curative instruction, the Minnesota Court of Appeals held that the denial of defendant’s motion for a mistrial was not an abuse of discretion.  Affirmed.

State v. Mutcherson, A20-0644, Stearns County.

Minnesota Criminal Defense Lawyer Lynne Torgerson was not attorney of record in this case.

By |2021-06-12T01:44:57+00:00June 12th, 2021|Victories/Case Law Updates|0 Comments

About the Author:

Leave A Comment